![recordit. review recordit. review](https://dt.azadicdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/RecorditXforXWindows.png)
“In fact, it is quite dangerous to propagate that notion among people. “‘Doing’ conservation often means grappling with very wicked problems, often intractable and there are no easy pat solutions - the way many success stories are often told makes it sound very easy and non-controversial and simplistic,” Aparajita Datta, a conservation scientist at the Nature Conservation Foundation based in Mysore, India, told Mongabay. Yet it’s the successes we love talking about.
We’ve learned from roadblocks - sometimes we’ve not. We’ve worked on projects far longer than we would have liked to and failed.
![recordit. review recordit. review](https://www.saashub.com/images/app/screenshots/20/6bd84ff6b78e/landing-medium.jpg)
The finding that interpersonal relations, and not external factors like politics, was the largest cause of project failures, is hopeful, the researchers say, because it tells us that we need to work on things we can actually influence.Some of the leading causes of project failures, according to the papers reviewed, were problematic interactions between people, lack of trust, negative experiences with past conservation initiatives, and inefficient communication.Researchers who reviewed the available scientific literature found only 59 peer-reviewed articles that had analyzed failures of conservation projects.Analysis of failures of conservation projects are rarely published, a new study has found.